ROMA (ITALPRESS) – The amendments approved in the referent “confirm the goal of making the Home Plan more oriented to the realization of complex interventions of urban regeneration and of construction contracted, introducing mechanisms that favor the participation of qualified private operators, expand the urban flexibility of the programs and strengthen the social and multifunctional dimension of the interventions”. This is what we read in a note of the association Remind, according to which “unless specific openings have been accepted to the real estate FIAs, the SICAF and the SIIQ/SIINQ, numerous changes appear consistent with models of institutional real estate investment and could foster in perspective a greater participation of private capital in the field of social housing”. For the association “it would be necessary to further strengthen the role of the extraordinary Commissioner, not only attributing to him functions of administrative coordination, but also tasks of promotion, structure and attraction of investments destined for social housing and urban regeneration”. “It would also be appropriate to extend the Guarantee Fund expressly to social housing operations, social housing programmes and the agreed lease models made by real estate funds dedicated to social housing”.
The provision “may be significantly strengthened by a clearer opening to real estate investment models and institutional capitals for social housing” The establishment of the “Fondo Housing Coesione” should be profoundly revised, replacing the exclusive reference to INVIMIT with an open formulation to the SGR authorized under the TUF (including the SGR of the CDP group). In this way, the Home Plan could be implemented through a multi-manager and multi-fund model, capable of engaging specialized operators and attracting large-scale private capital.” The provisions “would expressly stipulate that urban planning, authorization and procedural simplifications also apply to interventions promoted by FIA real estate and institutional investors operating in social housing”. One of the main issues concerns “the absence of an explicit public funding dedicated to the financing of integrated building infrastructure programmes”.
A first improvement proposal could consist of “in the introduction of a national fund dedicated to the co-financing of integrated building operations, intended in particular for the implementation of the agreed component of the interventions. Public support, even limited, could in fact help to increase the bankability of the projects and to make sustainable the respect of the minimum share of 70% contracted building provided by the norm”. It would also be appropriate to “expressly validate the role of real estate funds and institutional investors in the implementation of integrated building infrastructure programmes”. Finally, the association “reports the opportunity to integrate Article 11 with an express provision aimed at disciplinary re-use of the residual and unused resources of the National Resumption and Resilience Plan (PNRR) in the context of social housing initiatives agreed”.
– photo IPA Agency –
(ITALPRESS).
