ROMA (ITALPRESS) – A free way from the Council of Ministers to the Code of Edilitia. “After the road code and the code of contracts, with the building code we update other rules after more than 20 years of waiting. We offer Italy clearer and more certain rules, cutting the bureaucracy: in this way we will no longer have other cases-Milan, with disputes between local authorities and judiciary that risk paralyzing the cities. I am very satisfied,” comments Vicepremier and Minister of Infrastructures and Transport, Matteo Salvini.
“The launch of a building code is a positive novelty. There is indeed the need for rationalization and a new overall coding, taking into account the numerous changes that in more than twenty years have taken place with reference to the 2001 Single Construction Text, characterized by interventions confined to individual articles or institutes, without an organic view of the entire regulatory complex. In particular, a positive judgement deserves the explicit indication of the provisions which constitute fundamental principles of the matter to which the Regions must adhere in the exercise of their legislative power in a matter (what is the government of the territory, in which the building is included) to a competing legislative power”. It says in a note Giorgio Spaziani Testa, president of Conf building.
“Positive is also the prediction of the revision of the discipline concerning the building interventions carried out in the absence of title or in difformity from it and the procedures of sanatoria – he adds -. In this respect, it is of fundamental importance to predict the definitive overcoming of the requirement of the so-called ‘double compliance’, allowing the attainment of sanatorium even if it sussista the ‘sola’ according to the urban and building discipline in force at the time of the presentation of the application for sanatoria. Finally, it is important to highlight the express codification, at the level of state law, of the institutes, proper to the most modern techniques of planning, forequation, compensation and building premiality. In addition to these institutions, it would also be necessary to codify the institution of urban planning for agreements between public administration and private, which is also a modern constituent and indispensable way of preparing and implementing urban planning”.
-Photo IPA Agency-
(ITALPRESS).
